Austria vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Austria
77.3
in 2019
Hong Kong
78.28
in 2019
Austria rank
24th
Hong Kong rank
23rd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 78.28 against 77.3 in Austria, a difference of 0.98.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 24th and Hong Kong ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.3 | 89.68 | 12.39 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 77.3 | 78.93 | 1.64 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Austria or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 78.28 against 77.3 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Austria and Hong Kong?
- 0.98, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Austria ranks 24th and Hong Kong ranks 23rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.