Sudan vs Yemen: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Sudan
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Yemen
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan rank
177th
Yemen rank
177th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Sudan
- Yemen
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Yemen, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 177th and Yemen ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Sudan or Yemen?
- Sudan, at 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Yemen as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Sudan and Yemen?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Yemen?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and Yemen rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Sudan ranks 177th and Yemen ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.