South Africa vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
South Africa
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa rank
82nd
Uzbekistan rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- South Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 82nd and Uzbekistan ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), South Africa or Uzbekistan?
- South Africa, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- South Africa ranks 82nd and Uzbekistan ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.