South Africa vs Uganda: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
South Africa
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa rank
82nd
Uganda rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- South Africa
- Uganda
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
South Africa ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), South Africa or Uganda?
- South Africa, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between South Africa and Uganda?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Uganda rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- South Africa ranks 82nd and Uganda ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.