Singapore vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Singapore
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
15 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore rank
4th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
6th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Singapore
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 15.5 DB17-20 methodology against 15 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Singapore ranks 4th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Singapore or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Singapore, at 15.5 DB17-20 methodology against 15 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Singapore and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Singapore ranks 4th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.