Singapore vs Turkey: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Singapore
15.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Turkey
15 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore rank
4th
Turkey rank
6th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Singapore
- Turkey
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 15.5 DB17-20 methodology against 15 DB17-20 methodology in Turkey, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 4th and Turkey ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Singapore or Turkey?
- Singapore, at 15.5 DB17-20 methodology against 15 DB17-20 methodology in Turkey as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Singapore and Turkey?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Turkey?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and Turkey rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Singapore ranks 4th and Turkey ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.