Saudi Arabia vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Saudi Arabia
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sweden
12 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
36th
Sweden rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Saudi Arabia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.