Sao Tome and Principe vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Sao Tome and Principe
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Tonga
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st
Tonga rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Tonga
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st and Tonga ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Sao Tome and Principe or Tonga?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st and Tonga ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.