San Marino vs Togo: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
San Marino
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Togo
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
151st
Togo rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- San Marino
- Togo
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Togo, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 151st and Togo ranks 151st of 191 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), San Marino or Togo?
- San Marino, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between San Marino and Togo?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Togo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Togo rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- San Marino ranks 151st and Togo ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.