Qatar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Qatar
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Qatar rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Qatar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Qatar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Qatar, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Qatar ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.