Portugal vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Portugal
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Portugal rank
16th
Serbia rank
16th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Portugal
- Serbia
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Serbia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Portugal ahead.
Portugal ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Portugal or Serbia?
- Portugal, at 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Portugal and Serbia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Portugal and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Portugal ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.