Papua New Guinea vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Papua New Guinea
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
82nd
South Africa rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- South Africa
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Papua New Guinea or South Africa?
- Papua New Guinea, at 8.5 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Papua New Guinea and South Africa?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.