Pakistan vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Pakistan
5.65 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
5.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Pakistan rank
150th
San Marino rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Pakistan
- San Marino
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 5.65 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0.15 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Pakistan ranks 150th and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Pakistan or San Marino?
- Pakistan, at 5.65 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Pakistan and San Marino?
- 0.15 DB17-20 methodology, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Pakistan and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Pakistan ranks 150th and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.