Mexico vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Mexico
10.1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mexico rank
60th
Peru rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Mexico
- Peru
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0.6 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 60th and Peru ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Mexico or Peru?
- Mexico, at 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Mexico and Peru?
- 0.6 DB17-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Mexico ranks 60th and Peru ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.