Malta vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Malta
10.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia
10.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta rank
53rd
Namibia rank
53rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Malta
- Namibia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 10.5 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Namibia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Malta or Namibia?
- Malta, at 10.5 DB17-20 methodology against 10.5 DB17-20 methodology in Namibia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Malta and Namibia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Malta ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.