Malaysia vs North Macedonia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Malaysia
13 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
North Macedonia
13 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia rank
24th
North Macedonia rank
24th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Malaysia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 13 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 24th and North Macedonia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Malaysia or North Macedonia?
- Malaysia, at 13 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Malaysia and North Macedonia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and North Macedonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and North Macedonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Malaysia ranks 24th and North Macedonia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.