Malawi vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Malawi
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mexico
10.1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
63rd
Mexico rank
60th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Malawi
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0.6 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Malawi or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Malawi and Mexico?
- 0.6 DB17-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Malawi ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 60th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.