Libya vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Libya
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sudan
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Libya rank
176th
Sudan rank
176th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Libya
- Sudan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Sudan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Libya or Sudan?
- Libya, at 4 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Libya and Sudan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Libya ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 176th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.