Latvia vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Latvia
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Latvia rank
16th
Serbia rank
16th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Serbia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Serbia ahead.
Latvia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Latvia or Serbia?
- Latvia, at 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Latvia ranks 16th and Serbia ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.