What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Lao People's Democratic Republic

3.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Suriname

3.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Lao People's Democratic Republic rank

185th

Suriname rank

185th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Lao People's Democratic Republic
Suriname

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Suriname, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 185th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Suriname?: Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Suriname as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 185th and Suriname ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/lao-pdr/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/lao-pdr/suriname/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.