What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kiribati vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Kiribati

6 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Tanzania, United Republic of

6 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Kiribati rank

145th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

145th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Kiribati
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Kiribati or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Kiribati, at 6 DB17-20 methodology against 6 DB17-20 methodology in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Kiribati and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Kiribati ranks 145th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/kiribati/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/kiribati/tanzania/">Kiribati vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.