Iraq vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Iraq
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
East Timor
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iraq rank
191st
East Timor rank
190th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Iraq
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Iraq, a difference of 1 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.7 times Iraq's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 191st and East Timor ranks 190th of 191 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Iraq or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 2.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Iraq and East Timor?
- 1 DB17-20 methodology, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Iraq ranks 191st and East Timor ranks 190th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.