Indonesia vs Luxembourg: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Indonesia
8.89 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Luxembourg
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia rank
81st
Luxembourg rank
82nd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Indonesia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 8.89 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.39 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Indonesia ranks 81st and Luxembourg ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Indonesia or Luxembourg?
- Indonesia, at 8.89 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Indonesia and Luxembourg?
- 0.39 DB17-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Luxembourg rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Indonesia ranks 81st and Luxembourg ranks 82nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.