Iceland vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Iceland
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines
7.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iceland rank
109th
Philippines rank
109th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Iceland
- Philippines
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 7.5 DB17-20 methodology against 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 109th and Philippines ranks 109th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Iceland or Philippines?
- Iceland, at 7.5 DB17-20 methodology against 7.5 DB17-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Iceland and Philippines?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Iceland ranks 109th and Philippines ranks 109th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.