Hong Kong, China vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Hong Kong, China
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
61st
Peru rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Peru
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Hong Kong, China or Peru?
- Hong Kong, China, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Hong Kong, China and Peru?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.