Hong Kong, China vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Hong Kong, China
10 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mexico
10.1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
61st
Mexico rank
60th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.1 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 191 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Hong Kong, China or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 10.1 DB17-20 methodology against 10 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Hong Kong, China and Mexico?
- 0.1 DB17-20 methodology, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mexico?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 60th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.