How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malawi?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong, China vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Hong Kong, China

10 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Malawi

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Hong Kong, China rank

61st

Malawi rank

63rd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Hong Kong, China
Malawi

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Malawi ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Hong Kong, China or Malawi?: Hong Kong, China, at 10 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Hong Kong, China and Malawi?: 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malawi?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Hong Kong, China ranks 61st and Malawi ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/hong-kong-sar-china/malawi/">Hong Kong, China vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.