Grenada vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Grenada
11 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland
11 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
48th
Poland rank
48th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Grenada
- Poland
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 11 DB17-20 methodology against 11 DB17-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 48th and Poland ranks 48th of 190 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Grenada or Poland?
- Grenada, at 11 DB17-20 methodology against 11 DB17-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Grenada and Poland?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Grenada ranks 48th and Poland ranks 48th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.