Finland vs Indonesia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Finland
8.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Indonesia
8.89 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Finland rank
82nd
Indonesia rank
81st
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Finland
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 8.89 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Finland, a difference of 0.39 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 82nd and Indonesia ranks 81st of 191 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Finland or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 8.89 DB17-20 methodology against 8.5 DB17-20 methodology in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Finland and Indonesia?
- 0.39 DB17-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Indonesia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Indonesia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Finland ranks 82nd and Indonesia ranks 81st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.