Eritrea vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Eritrea
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Timor-Leste
2.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Eritrea rank
189th
Timor-Leste rank
190th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Eritrea
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Timor-Leste's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 189th and Timor-Leste ranks 190th of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Eritrea or Timor-Leste?
- Eritrea, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 2.5 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Eritrea and Timor-Leste?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Eritrea ranks 189th and Timor-Leste ranks 190th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.