How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Peru?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Czechia

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Peru

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Czechia rank

63rd

Peru rank

63rd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Czechia
Peru

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Czechia or Peru?: Czechia, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Czechia and Peru?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Peru?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Czechia and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Czechia ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/czechia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/czechia/peru/">Czechia vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.