Czechia vs Jamaica: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Czechia
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Jamaica
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Czechia rank
63rd
Jamaica rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Czechia
- Jamaica
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Jamaica, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 63rd and Jamaica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Czechia or Jamaica?
- Czechia, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Jamaica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Czechia and Jamaica?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Jamaica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Jamaica rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Czechia ranks 63rd and Jamaica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.