What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Côte d'Ivoire vs Russian Federation: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Côte d'Ivoire

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Russian Federation

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Côte d'Ivoire rank

63rd

Russian Federation rank

63rd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Côte d'Ivoire
Russian Federation

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Russian Federation, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 63rd and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Côte d'Ivoire or Russian Federation?: Côte d'Ivoire, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Russian Federation as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Russian Federation rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Côte d'Ivoire ranks 63rd and Russian Federation ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Russian Federation: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/cote-d-ivoire/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/cote-d-ivoire/russian-federation/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Russian Federation: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.