Costa Rica vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Costa Rica
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
63rd
Peru rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Costa Rica
- Peru
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Costa Rica or Peru?
- Costa Rica, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Costa Rica and Peru?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Costa Rica ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.