What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Central African Republic and San Marino?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and San Marino?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central African Republic vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Central African Republic

5.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

San Marino

5.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Central African Republic rank

151st

San Marino rank

151st

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Central African Republic
San Marino

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Central African Republic or San Marino?: Central African Republic, at 5.5 DB17-20 methodology against 5.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Central African Republic and San Marino?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and San Marino?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Central African Republic ranks 151st and San Marino ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/central-african-republic/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/central-african-republic/san-marino/">Central African Republic vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.