Brunei vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Brunei
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Brunei rank
36th
Saudi Arabia rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Brunei
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 11.5 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Brunei ranks 36th and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Brunei or Saudi Arabia?
- Brunei, at 11.5 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Brunei and Saudi Arabia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brunei and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Brunei ranks 36th and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.