Brunei Darussalam vs France: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Brunei Darussalam
11.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
France
12 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
36th
France rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 36th and France ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Brunei Darussalam or France?
- France, at 12 DB17-20 methodology against 11.5 DB17-20 methodology in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Brunei Darussalam and France?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and France?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and France rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 36th and France ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.