Brazil vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Brazil
13.09 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malaysia
13 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Brazil rank
23rd
Malaysia rank
24th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Brazil
- Malaysia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 13.09 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 0.09 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malaysia ahead.
Brazil ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Brazil or Malaysia?
- Brazil, at 13.09 DB17-20 methodology against 13 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Brazil and Malaysia?
- 0.09 DB17-20 methodology, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Brazil ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.