Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Peru
9.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
63rd
Peru rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Peru as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Peru ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.