How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Bosnia and Herzegovina

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Malawi

9.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Bosnia and Herzegovina rank

63rd

Malawi rank

63rd

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Malawi

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 63rd of 191 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malawi?: Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 9.5 DB17-20 methodology against 9.5 DB17-20 methodology in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?: Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Malawi ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/bosnia-and-herzegovina/malawi/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.