Bhutan vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Bhutan
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Jordan
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bhutan rank
94th
Jordan rank
94th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Bhutan
- Jordan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Jordan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Jordan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Bhutan or Jordan?
- Bhutan, at 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Bhutan and Jordan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Jordan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Bhutan ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.