Belgium vs El Salvador: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Belgium
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
El Salvador
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Belgium rank
94th
El Salvador rank
94th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Belgium
- El Salvador
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in El Salvador, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 94th and El Salvador ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Belgium or El Salvador?
- Belgium, at 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Belgium and El Salvador?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and El Salvador?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and El Salvador rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Belgium ranks 94th and El Salvador ranks 94th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.