Bahrain vs Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Bahrain
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Nigeria
9.15 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bahrain rank
75th
Nigeria rank
74th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Bahrain
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 9.15 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Bahrain, a difference of 0.15 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 75th and Nigeria ranks 74th of 191 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Bahrain or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 9.15 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Bahrain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Bahrain and Nigeria?
- 0.15 DB17-20 methodology, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Nigeria?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Nigeria rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Bahrain ranks 75th and Nigeria ranks 74th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.