Bahrain vs Kenya: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Bahrain
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Kenya
9 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bahrain rank
75th
Kenya rank
75th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Bahrain
- Kenya
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kenya, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Bahrain ranks 75th and Kenya ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Bahrain or Kenya?
- Bahrain, at 9 DB17-20 methodology against 9 DB17-20 methodology in Kenya as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Bahrain and Kenya?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Kenya?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bahrain and Kenya rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Bahrain ranks 75th and Kenya ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.