Syria vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Syria
55 number
in 2014
East Timor
51 number
in 2014
Syria rank
1st
East Timor rank
3rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Syria
  • East Timor
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Syria currently reports 55 number against 51 number in East Timor, a difference of 4 number.

That makes Syria's figure about 1.1 times East Timor's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Syria has been ahead every year.

Syria ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 3rd of 181 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Syria East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 55 number 51 number 4 number Syria
2010s 55 number 51 number 4 number Syria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Syria or East Timor?
Syria, at 55 number against 51 number in East Timor as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Syria and East Timor?
4 number, with Syria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and East Timor?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Syria and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Syria ranks 1st and East Timor ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.