Suriname vs Taiwan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

Suriname
44 number
in 2014
Taiwan
45 number
in 2014
Suriname rank
28th
Taiwan rank
26th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • Suriname
  • Taiwan
01020304050200320082014

How they compare

Taiwan currently reports 45 number against 44 number in Suriname, a difference of 1 number.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 28th and Taiwan ranks 26th of 181 countries.

Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Taiwan Difference Ahead
2000s 44 number 45 number 1 number Taiwan
2010s 44 number 45 number 1 number Taiwan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Suriname or Taiwan?
Taiwan, at 45 number against 44 number in Suriname as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Suriname and Taiwan?
1 number, with Taiwan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Taiwan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Suriname and Taiwan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
Suriname ranks 28th and Taiwan ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.