Spain vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Spain
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Spain currently reports 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Spain ahead.
Spain ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.57 number | 40 number | 1.57 number | Spain |
| 2010s | 40 number | 40 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Spain or Sri Lanka?
- Spain, at 40 number against 40 number in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Spain and Sri Lanka?
- 0 number, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sri Lanka?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Spain and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Spain ranks 60th and Sri Lanka ranks 60th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.