South Africa vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

South Africa
29 number
in 2014
United Kingdom
29 number
in 2014
South Africa rank
164th
United Kingdom rank
164th

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • South Africa
  • United Kingdom
0102030200320082014

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 29 number against 29 number in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 number.

Across all 12 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 164th and United Kingdom ranks 164th of 181 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 30 number 31 number 1 number United Kingdom
2010s 29 number 29 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, South Africa or United Kingdom?
South Africa, at 29 number against 29 number in United Kingdom as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between South Africa and United Kingdom?
0 number, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and United Kingdom?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do South Africa and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
South Africa ranks 164th and United Kingdom ranks 164th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.