Serbia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Serbia
- Thailand
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 36 number against 36 number in Thailand, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 108th and Thailand ranks 108th of 181 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.86 number | 36 number | 0.8571 number | Serbia |
| 2010s | 36 number | 36 number | 0 number | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Serbia or Thailand?
- Serbia, at 36 number against 36 number in Thailand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Serbia and Thailand?
- 0 number, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Thailand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Serbia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Serbia ranks 108th and Thailand ranks 108th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.