Saudi Arabia vs Uzbekistan: Enforcing contracts: Procedures
Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 41 number against 41 number in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 number.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 51st and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43 number | 42 number | 1 number | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 41.8 number | 41.6 number | 0.2 number | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, Saudi Arabia or Uzbekistan?
- Saudi Arabia, at 41 number against 41 number in Uzbekistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 number, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Uzbekistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 51st and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.